
Abstract/Summary
Land is the most important productive asset in agrarian
societies such as Cambodia’s. Throughout Cambodian history, land ownership
rights have varied with changes in government. In the period before French
colonisation (pre-1863), when all land belonged to the sovereign, people were
freely allowed to till unoccupied land and could cultivate as much as they
liked. With French colonisation, a property-rights system was introduced in
1884. After Cambodia gained independence from France in 1953, a Western-style
land ownership system continued until 1975, when the Khmer Rouge seized power
and eliminated all private property rights. Land ownership rights were
reintroduced in 1989, following the failure of the Khmer Rouge regime in 1979
and ten years of unsuccessful collectivised production.
Within ten years of the reintroduction of private
ownership and the redistribution of land, land issues have become one of the
most sensitive economic, social, and political issues in Cambodia, demanding
urgent solution. In the absence of comprehensive land-related data, this study
extensively analyses secondary data and primary data from four large-scale
surveys to better understand the magnitude of current land issues.
Based
on this analysis, it appears that most of Cambodians own at least some land,
but only a small proportion of the population has official land titles. Over 70
to 80 percent of the total rural population possesses agricultural land
acquired in different ways (government distribution, gifts from
relatives/friends, purchase, or clearance of unused land), but only 1 percent
has legal title to their land.
The
average size of agricultural holdings in Cambodia is quite small (only about 1
hectare per family) and distribution is highly unequal. Female-headed
households generally have smaller holdings than male-headed households. About
40 to 50 percent of the landless and marginal landholders possess only about 10
to 15 percent of all agricultural land in rural areas. The estimated Gini
coefficients of land concentration range from 0.47 to 0.66 for the different
surveys that target different population groups.
Even
though only a very small proportion of the population has official title to
their land, people have been actively transferring land (their only productive
asset) on the market. Not only has private property changed hands, but also common
property, such as forestry and fishery resources (state property), has been
actively transferred to private use as concessions or for long-term investment.
In the concluding chapter, the study draws
some policy implications and proposes some suggestions for the improvement of
future studies of land issues. The suggestions include questions to be answered
in future research, as well as specific items to include in future survey
questionnaires